The Zionist regime make a move to protect their soldiers from war crime

The Zionist's government of Israel is about to approve a bill to grant aid and support to their zionist soldiers which at the brim of suits for the war crimes in Gaza. It's more likely that this soldiers will face law suits against the used of the Phosphorus weapons again civilian, or at least somebody must be held responsible for such actions.

The bill, titled "strengthening the IDF's hand after Operation Cast Lead", was put forward by none other than Defense Minister Ehud Barak himself, with some coordination with the Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Justice and State Prosecutor. According to Barak, "the government carries the responsibility for sending IDF soldiers on military operations and as a result is obligated to grant them complete support against any possible harm to them stemming from those operations."
Barak said "I do not know of any army that operates at the high standards that the IDF operates," "There is no place for an automatic backlash following every operation." Barak claim that the zionist army behaved according to its high moral values during Cast Lead. "As an army which is unsurpassed in its moral traditions, the IDF has done all that it can in order to adhere to international law, in order to avoid harming civilians who are not involved in fighting," Barak said, he adding some more to such moral principles by saying "have not always been enough to prevent tragedies from happening." 

Well mister, unfortunately records from score of human rights body base in Palestinian and Israel state the otherwise. Palestinians, Jewish as well as the International Human Right body agree about this. There is awfully lots of them inside occupied region and in the matters of facts the occupied region is the most watch area in the world.
for the past 30 year the International community has came to broad consensus to solve the issue namely the 2 state settlement. Two state settlement mean that Israel has to fully withdraw from territory it occupy in 1967 war. This mean they need to withdraw from the West Bank, Jerusalem and Gaza Strip. This is the International law. Its not admissible to acquire territory by war. That what the world court said. This is what written in the in the United Nation charter. Go and read it before you guy(s) slam me ok. This is the fundamental principal of article 2 in the United nation charter. what about the International Court of justice decision on the wall that Israeli built around the occupied territory? what about that? well in july 2007 International Court of justice landed adversary opinion that the wall is illegal under international law, that Israeli is legally bound to remove it all and paid compensation to the damage due to teh construction and those involved.

So now this funny minister of zionist Israel talking about adhere to international law and yet ignore many of UN resolutions pertinent to their occupation! It's the same set of International law that Israeli claim that are bound to. or perhaps they have the privilege to chose whichever that suit their liking only. While at the same time ignore the rests, with the blessing of the United State of America of course! Israel only quote international law as it deem fit to to serve their purpose yet deprive the same law for the palestinians people. That what I see as far as I remember. 


So enough with that, so let get back to the issue at hand. So when the news paper run the articles about the Israeli WP. The IDF spokesman quickly (as always) denied the use of phosphorus and said that Israel was using only the weapons that were allowed under international law. 

But photographic evidence as well as the video clips has emerged and proves that Israel has been using this white phosphorus weapon during its offensive in Gaza. There is many evidence that the phosphorus weapon have injured Palestinian civilians, the dead may not speak about it but surely one can see the horrifies burn mark on them. Some of the victim is still pretty much alive at this time of writing, hence could tell the world how they felt having part of their body burned out. And many more who's lucky enough doesn't caught in fire can always tell the horror story about the sadistic events. People like Sabah Abu Halima who's suffered terrible burns on her arms, legs and torso can tell you such terribly experience: "There was fire, and so much white smoke". "The missile melted my children. My daughter-in-law melted in front of my eyes." This is publish in BBC News, you can go and read more over here.


But then rows of M825A1 white phosphorus (WP) shells were photographed on the Israel De fence Forces artillery units on the side of the Israel-Gaza border. The Times has identified stockpiles of white phosphorus (WP) shells from high-resolution images. Confronted with this latest evidence, an IDF spokeswoman suddenly change the tone of her statement and insisted that the M825A1 shell was not a WP type. “This is what we call a quiet shell - it is empty, it has no explosives and no white phosphorus. 

she said There is nothing inside it, We shoot it to mark the target before we launch a real shell. And reiterate that Israel was using only the weapons that were allowed under international law. 


yeah right! Like that we don't know that this pale blue M825A1 WP munitions made in USA and heavily used in Fallujah. If I was the reporter I would ask ask her, if we could shoot her with the so call empty shell and let see if it could burn her kind pussy(of course I mean the cat) out of her sorry ass. I hate this saddo lunatic of uncharacteristic being.Darn! 

Of course the Israeli's spokesman/woman will quickly deny it such as; nooo! those are not white phosphorus burn, we have not used white phosphorus in this war, hamas did! while lookin at you in the eyes.

Typical Israeli government statements I must say.

This is nothing to shock about, for those of you who is new to this area, Israel has a very poor reputation for telling the truth. In 1982, it denied using phosphorous munitions on civilian areas in Lebanon, not until journalists discovered dying and dead civilians whose with a strange burn and the wounds caught fire when exposed to air. Some even have the "privileged of it kind" to witness the nature and characteristic of WP when 2 dead babies who, when taken out from a mortuary drawer in West Beirut during the Israeli siege of the city suddenly burst back into flames! Lebanese hospitals fill to the brim with patients with burn wounds consistent with phosphorous munitions.Then a bit latter, Israel suddenly admitted that it had not been telling the truth. Jacob Edery, the Israeli minister in charge of government-parliament relations, confirmed that phosphorous shells were used in direct attacks against Hizbollah, adding that "according to international law, the use of phosphorous munitions is authorized and the (Israeli) army keeps to the rules of international norms".

What law? So don't you see, It the same arguments, The Zionist just dish out the same reasons over and over again. It's a standard reply. perhaps they just changed the date and there rest is the same all same.  The shell is not defined as an incendiary weapon by the Third Protocol in the Convention on Conventional Weapons because its principal use is to produce smoke to protect troops. We know that the white phosphorus is a weapon intended to provide a smokescreen for troop movements(as an obscurant/smoke screen) on the battlefield. But the use of white phosphorous as a weapon other than that, is banned by the Third Convention on Conventional Weapons which covers the use of incendiary devices. Though Israel(and their big brother the US) is not a signatory to the convention, its military manuals reflect the restrictions on its use.

The nature of white phosphorous as highly incendiary effect in such that it should never be used on civilian areas, is clear define in the international convention on the use of incendiary weapons. It should not be used where there is a possibility of hitting civilians. So looking at a densely populated Gaza Strip, one of the most dense area in the world. You just cannot shoot above their head and expect none of it hit them. That is insane. This is no Viet Cong in dense jungle that the US burn them alive with infamous napalm! This is no vietnam. There are 1.5 million Palestinians pack and squeezed in this small occupied territory. How does one think is does hit civilians? Unless if it was their goal to hit any Palestinians. 


As the passing of such bill is not enough, the Israeli military censor is applying strict restrictions preventing the media from identifying soldiers who participated in the Gaza Strip offensive and all information about them that may be used in legal proceedings against them in international court abroad.

So yess they are afraid, they are very afraid I must say. I can't help but see the growing concern (read:fear) linger at the core of zionist supreme regime. With the Strengthening the IDF's Hand after Operation Cast Lead bill plus the censorm it clear they did everthing they can to protect the murderer and their cohort. Hide as much as you could but the evidence of this blantant atrocity is abundance and widely acknowledge and there is no doubts about it. Hence, only time will tell if the mighty Jewish power lobby could do their magic this time